"Doctor's Data are a catalog of their perfidy."
supposedly this will help prevent legal thuggery : http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2010/06/more_legal_thuggery.php#more
http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/Tests/urine_toxic.html
"Doctor's data" "lab" is not a Lab in the real sense but a way to defraud it seems --this is all too common nowadays
we need to end this SLAPP stuff bringing thugs to public light can really prevent it --i hope!
Thursday, July 1, 2010
Sunday, September 27, 2009
TOPICAL--people watching
Something very entertaining to me is the various explanations for the plot holes found in many "geek" movies in the article in Wired http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/09/top-10-unanswered-questions-in-geeky-movies/comment-page-4/#comments
Of course, this is more humorous than informative. However, the internet is a cool tool with which one can "watch" people, even if they do not want "lurkers", they are everywhere --get used to it! We're here, we leer, get used to it! LOL
more could be said...
Of course, this is more humorous than informative. However, the internet is a cool tool with which one can "watch" people, even if they do not want "lurkers", they are everywhere --get used to it! We're here, we leer, get used to it! LOL
more could be said...
Saturday, September 26, 2009
TOPICAL
Rejecting, changing and keeping “who" one is.
First, how do you know who or what you are? Then, once you know this how do you do it and/or why would one do any of the 3 aforementioned activities?
The question of if one can change what one is ontologically is beyond the scope of this post. However, one can change professions and occupations AND I think one’s“addiction status”—thus it is not necessary to be, for example, an alcoholic forever.---Being aware of the dangers of addiction is great but labeling oneself as always being a lover of alcoholic drinks is limiting in the sense that if one think one is failing in any way does one say “I will always turn to alcohol if I am in trouble"? This reminds me of the Christian idea of sin and sinners where one is to always be known as a “sinner" because one cannot save oneself as a point of doctrine. Too many have fallen for the trap that says, “if I sin a little, it will not hurt to sin more because I am already sinning some.”
Then there is changing one’s physical hard wiring that one is born with. Is it possible to do that in any significant sense? I do not, at this time, think it is possible in any practical sense. Thus one's autism status, i.e. one's routing of major nerve pathways, I believe it is not practical once one is an adult to change where the nerve branches come from and where they go. I do believe that one can change the size of these trunks and make new“smaller”connections at this point. However, to force major changes at this point is neither practical nor kind. Thus, parents who are involved in the movement that says “vaccines” are the majority cause of autism who attempt to “cure” these “wire placements” are only hurting not helping their child. Much has been said about adult people who have managed to avoid being institutionalized or isolated; that they are not really autistic. People who are now adults who are in this position are merely lucky and skilled not “non-autistic” IMO
Then there is “who". To change one's legal name and personality can be done with various levels of effort. However, to change one's core attitude toward the world outside of oneself is often done only with outside influence. Thus a person who desires to respond peacefully to outside unpleasant “stimuli” will do this whether the are depressed either psychologically or physiologically. To change that basic “instinct”requires prolonged conditioning in the Skinnerian sense. This is why, for example, the first year of a dog’s life is SO critical to keep non-violent and varied in exposures to ALL things. This relates to the above current subject of autistic children and how they are treated by their parents. If these children are subjected to a frequent life of unpleasant “treatments” that are intended to “cure”them, they may end up fearful or resentful, at the very least, of anything that seems to have caused this painful life. Since such children may very well grow up to be adults with varying levels of social interaction, parents should keep this in mind because it is NOT like such quack treatments are saving their life like proven leukemia treatments might. These kids will live on in a serious way affecting people around them knowing in varying degrees that their parents were responsible for their comfort that they experienced, or not, as a child. Talk about bitter! I would be! This may give you a clue as to how this works read http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33013187/ns/health-kids_and_parenting/
More on changing who/what you are in later posts.
First, how do you know who or what you are? Then, once you know this how do you do it and/or why would one do any of the 3 aforementioned activities?
The question of if one can change what one is ontologically is beyond the scope of this post. However, one can change professions and occupations AND I think one’s“addiction status”—thus it is not necessary to be, for example, an alcoholic forever.---Being aware of the dangers of addiction is great but labeling oneself as always being a lover of alcoholic drinks is limiting in the sense that if one think one is failing in any way does one say “I will always turn to alcohol if I am in trouble"? This reminds me of the Christian idea of sin and sinners where one is to always be known as a “sinner" because one cannot save oneself as a point of doctrine. Too many have fallen for the trap that says, “if I sin a little, it will not hurt to sin more because I am already sinning some.”
Then there is changing one’s physical hard wiring that one is born with. Is it possible to do that in any significant sense? I do not, at this time, think it is possible in any practical sense. Thus one's autism status, i.e. one's routing of major nerve pathways, I believe it is not practical once one is an adult to change where the nerve branches come from and where they go. I do believe that one can change the size of these trunks and make new“smaller”connections at this point. However, to force major changes at this point is neither practical nor kind. Thus, parents who are involved in the movement that says “vaccines” are the majority cause of autism who attempt to “cure” these “wire placements” are only hurting not helping their child. Much has been said about adult people who have managed to avoid being institutionalized or isolated; that they are not really autistic. People who are now adults who are in this position are merely lucky and skilled not “non-autistic” IMO
Then there is “who". To change one's legal name and personality can be done with various levels of effort. However, to change one's core attitude toward the world outside of oneself is often done only with outside influence. Thus a person who desires to respond peacefully to outside unpleasant “stimuli” will do this whether the are depressed either psychologically or physiologically. To change that basic “instinct”requires prolonged conditioning in the Skinnerian sense. This is why, for example, the first year of a dog’s life is SO critical to keep non-violent and varied in exposures to ALL things. This relates to the above current subject of autistic children and how they are treated by their parents. If these children are subjected to a frequent life of unpleasant “treatments” that are intended to “cure”them, they may end up fearful or resentful, at the very least, of anything that seems to have caused this painful life. Since such children may very well grow up to be adults with varying levels of social interaction, parents should keep this in mind because it is NOT like such quack treatments are saving their life like proven leukemia treatments might. These kids will live on in a serious way affecting people around them knowing in varying degrees that their parents were responsible for their comfort that they experienced, or not, as a child. Talk about bitter! I would be! This may give you a clue as to how this works read http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33013187/ns/health-kids_and_parenting/
More on changing who/what you are in later posts.
Experimentation
One of the first things a newborn mammal does is experiment with its environment. If one is not depressed physiologically or psychologically this activity will continue. Thus, I now wish to experiment with a "blog" .
Firstly, the definition of blog, short for "web log", has seemed to expand to mean a list of comments, essays from one person or many, or a web page that picks and chooses who may write there or a web page that does not. I wish to have all parts of that new definition fulfilled here.
I do not want anyone to be exploited for any reason especially to make money. Therefore, I will limit such goings on as much I can, other than that, I hope that my moods will allow a full range of activity here.
In order to prevent confusion, I hope most of my posts will be tightly topical. I will try to remember this and to indicate where I will do otherwise.—Please, reader, remind me of this if I stray from this because I go off on tangents often
Another note, in order to be authentic I will try to not over edit and re-edit what I write even if I look back and see what looks like embarrassing content. Most of the edits should be for spelling or basic grammar. However, the restriction of American grammar will not be followed, including restrictions on use of the passive voice—LOL--Many embarrassing things can be used by others to learn something, so if I look like a fool—too bad!
A further note, the use of my legal identity can be used to exploit me or others so I will not reveal it because it is not needed for the purposes of this blog. However, people can contact me, and over some time people may win my trust of them AND whom I think may read their notes about me.[if they write of speak anything about me]. I will assure the reader that I get no money or other considerations for anything I write here. I DO know that some may suspect me of being involved with their favorite conspiracy theory but that is their own quirk.
GOSH, what qualifications, asides and notes I feel that I need to go thru in order to just write something open to the general public! However, humans are diverse and can seem unpredictable if one does not know their background. Therefore, I tried to consider everyone that may read and question my format here.
TOPICAL-- CHRONOLOGICAL-- STREAM OF CONSCIOUSNESS Those are the headings of 3 sections of this blog. I hope that is Google blog will allow me to easily divide my posts this way.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
